Author: rfhurley

There isn’t much to see so far (my contacts are a little slow getting me things like “content”– something I’m beginning to suspect is somewhat endemic to this crazy web-building biz…), so this is just the layout (and temporary at best)– but I did do a logo (my second as a designer), and I did a very clean all-CSS based layout for the site using a PHP-include framework.

OK OK. Enough run-on sentence(s?). The site is for the Santa Rosa Free Clinic, which is sponsored by Catholic Charities Family Services. Click on the pretty screenshot, which will take you to the site:

…

For other examples of my work, check out my homepage at glassangel.com, which is the “official” site for my nascent web-design business.

If you would like to provide feedback for any of my work, I would be happy to receive it here at this blog, or at the email address at the bottom of my portfolio page.

C’Mon down to Glen Ellen’s Trash ‘n’ Trailer!

 …

Well, I made my move to Glen Ellen, bought myself a cheap digital camera, and… images are coming in NOW…

but I’ve really enjoyed reading the blog posts today. People leading such interesting lives, roaming the world in search of new adventures…

wait a second. I’m envious.

I hate YOU ALL!!!

};-)>

 
My fabulous life

Scientific American, no less, checks in on Tom Tomorrow’s explanation of how Dick Cheney can be alternately in the executive or legislative branch, depending on who’s asking.

http://blog.sciam.com/index.php?title=vice_president_cheney_found_to_be_in_vio&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1&ref=rss

And here’s the only logical explanation, from This Modern World:

…

There she is, palling around with terrorists:

 Scientists are creating such embryos for medical research; the British government is proposing to authorize their creation but to forbid them from being transferred to a human womb or kept alive beyond 14 days. Bishops’ testimony: 1) “Interspecies embryos” should be treated like human embryos. 2) “At very least, embryos with a preponderance of human genes should be assumed to be embryonic human beings.” 3) “It should not be a crime to transfer them … to the body of the woman providing the ovum, in cases where a human ovum has been used to create them. Such a woman is the genetic mother, or partial mother, of the embryo; should she have a change of heart and wish to carry her child to term, she should not be prevented from doing so.” Scientists’ response: No human ovum is involved when we put a human cell nucleus in an animal egg. Rebuttal: That’s not the only kind of interspecies embryo the legislation authorizes.

From Slate magazine